Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D70C9FBF74 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:06:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22917-06 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:06:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C869F9FBF0F for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:06:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so159039ugf for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=P+OjtP+dVg5JpULtbUqzDlnixWCPqvFGWccXlCVPIfINhtRxkbex2DG5twlyi2npwaFmwg5dtqNOVtayRnowYBxa+XxlSAZOUtLpRaEogWz13crrbJl2GnP5xKeMLw6SwxEMrc1cQHo5ZRO/x5XZZDWUGSq2lCtQIRb81TGldis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=HgvgIU3q6wqLvpWink3CYPiuPQok5SHOfWl2hLhaVFUK+lLKzPWuofaoBvUl+jOE/0ggWVLMAMjRMCIsjiGsrlZ0WGEA0z+Enz+ItDhRZ74G6dnsyrdYsk+NAmz3VncKfWPKrKyB0OYji30cM+S15kv4Q0H1HvYtsmZk67wkP0U= Received: by 10.82.170.2 with SMTP id s2mr11112056bue.1184169627671; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.33? ( [86.27.136.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm23465711nfu.2007.07.11.09.00.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4694FE64.8070407@enterprisedb.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:59:32 +0100 From: Heikki Linnakangas User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jignesh K. Shah" CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark References: <46925AD9.9020208@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <46925AD9.9020208@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/96 X-Sequence-Number: 25780 Jignesh K. Shah wrote: > Hello all, > > I think this result will be useful for performance discussions of > postgresql against other databases. > > http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/ > > More on Josh Berkus's blog: > > http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/postgresql-publishes-first-real-benchmark-17470 May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this quote: > Recoverable 2-phase transactions were used to coordinate the interaction between > the database server and JMS server using Sun's Last Agent Logging > Optimization; the 1PC database transactions and transaction log records are > written to the database in a single transaction. Did you perhaps use 2PC at first, but didn't bother to change the config after switching to the last agent optimization? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com