Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:34:13 -0400
From: "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
In-reply-to: <27436.1184173639@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-id: <469522A5.1070409@sun.com>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <46925AD9.9020208@sun.com> <4694FE64.8070407@enterprisedb.com>
	<4695063D.9040108@sun.com> <27436.1184173639@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061110)

Can you list others that seemed out of place?

Thanks.
Regards,
Jignesh


Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM> writes:
>   
>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>     
>>> May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while 
>>> you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this 
>>> quote:
>>>       
>
>   
>> Yep.. one of the things that we didn't revert back and got strayed out 
>> there.
>>     
>
> There were quite a few settings in that list that looked like random
> experimentation rather than recommendable good practice to me.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>