DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
	b=ltCLeXFnpJr/Vsf5Xe6tgSFwPXNsPf5hb/5MlaJRDRRE/cN6SnBEyxb+ebMDQT/oJ0j9szWCQrrTrs+t9aD/bbnEbk1/LMv7AM5aseYqPp32aK4eSmsg52qUKuy7eAbTxW3DZkk+vdoVBvNjmexqUP3FrQnwrkpSmCbS7B9oMx0=
Message-ID: <46B5F5C7.1070901@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:07:35 +0100
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sven Clement <sven@dsign.lu>
CC: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Kroeger <andrew@sprocks.gotdns.com>,
	Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>,  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with large telemetric datasets
 on 7.4.2
References: <881035ea0708030652r37b25a86g61e88e1f5e95eab2@mail.gmail.com>
	<1186150836.19184.194.camel@archimedes>
	<881035ea0708030857s621af020r4d3d7b994e2ca9a3@mail.gmail.com>
	<46B39A77.8050105@sprocks.gotdns.com>
	<4770.1186180449@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<881035ea0708041303h4ea256b3q4b40c5291f8cd3b7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <881035ea0708041303h4ea256b3q4b40c5291f8cd3b7@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sven Clement wrote:
> OK so beginning on Monday I will test the config on a 8.2.x to verify the
> performance issues, but I also found some disturbing info's on the net, that
> the index may be corrupted because of the big difference between an index
> entry which is deleted and the new value inserted afterwards, which should
> not be an issue with a btree, but do you guys know something more about it,
> sorry I'm really good in SQL but in Postgre I'm still a beginner.

I don't remember a bug like that. Where did you read that from?

-- 
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com