Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7619F9CA6 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:50:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60712-03 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:50:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4CF9F9C1B for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:50:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:50:45 -0500 Message-Id: <46CC3F22.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:50:26 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: , "Stephen Davies" Subject: Re: Optimising "in" queries References: <200708221210.36770.scldad@sdc.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200708221210.36770.scldad@sdc.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/245 X-Sequence-Number: 26375 >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 9:40 PM, in message <200708221210.36770.scldad@sdc.com.au>, Stephen Davies wrote:=20 > Is there any way to make the "larger" queries more efficient? =20 People would be in a better position to answer that if you posted the = table structure and the results of EXPLAIN ANALYZE (rather than just EXPLAIN). =20 -Kevin