Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB3F9FA4DF for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:54:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24807-04 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:54:08 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.pppoe.ca [206.248.154.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6E99F9C3B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:54:07 -0300 (ADT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CADps1UbO+Igp/2dsb2JhbACCbQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.19,323,1183348800"; d="scan'208,217";a="5770571" Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2007 15:54:06 -0400 Received: from [206.248.136.41] ([206.248.136.41]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id IBF33206; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:54:06 -0400 Message-ID: <46D5CEDD.5010303@mark.mielke.cc> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:54:05 -0400 From: Mark Mielke User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mbguy2000-1@yahoo.com CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Transaction Log References: <782718.73151.qm@web31603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <782718.73151.qm@web31603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090103070607010707070905" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/385 X-Sequence-Number: 26515 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090103070607010707070905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit mbguy2000-1@yahoo.com wrote: > For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk. > > Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller > as well? If not, what do people think about writing the transaction > log to a flash card or the like? How popular are the battery backed RAM drives that exist today? I don't recall seeing them spoken about in this mailing list. The local geek shop has these devices on sale. Are they still too expensive? For those that don't know what I am talking about - they are PCI devices that present themselves as a hard drive, but are filled with commodity RAM instead of a magnetic platter, and a battery that lasts a few weeks without external power. Cheers, mark -- Mark Mielke --------------090103070607010707070905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit mbguy2000-1@yahoo.com wrote:
For best performance, the transaction log should be on a separate disk.

Does the writing of the log benefit from a battery backed controller as well?  If not, what do people think about writing the transaction log to a flash card or the like?
How popular are the battery backed RAM drives that exist today? I don't recall seeing them spoken about in this mailing list. The local geek shop has these devices on sale. Are they still too expensive?

For those that don't know what I am talking about - they are PCI devices that present themselves as a hard drive, but are filled with commodity RAM instead of a magnetic platter, and a battery that lasts a few weeks without external power.

Cheers,
mark

-- 
Mark Mielke <mark@mielke.cc>
--------------090103070607010707070905--