Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBC09F9D79 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:09:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70526-06 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:09:41 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532FC9F9D50 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:09:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id 5972C3143C; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:09:42 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ron Mayer X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:09:44 -0700 Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services Lines: 9 Message-ID: <46DEF0E8.8070509@cheapcomplexdevices.com> References: <20070904230639.GA23731@alvh.no-ip.org> <46DE66CF.9000903@theendofthetunnel.de> <90bce5730709051016j5291827dx525d6b8fe4960fbd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org To: Trevor Talbot User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070730) In-Reply-To: <90bce5730709051016j5291827dx525d6b8fe4960fbd@mail.gmail.com> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.028 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.027, BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200709/57 X-Sequence-Number: 26602 Trevor Talbot wrote: > > Lack of reliability compared to _UFS_? Can you elaborate on this? What elaboration's needed? UFS seems to have one of the longest histories of support from major vendors of any file system supported on any OS (Solaris, HP-UX, SVR4, Tru64 Unix all use it). Can you elaborate on your question?