Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17429FA60F for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:40:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57135-04-3 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:40:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from olive.qinip.net (olive.qinip.net [62.100.30.40]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4329FA580 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:40:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (h8441139206.dsl.speedlinq.nl [84.41.139.206]) by olive.qinip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF4018074; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:40:30 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:40:25 +0200 From: Arjen van der Meijden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lewis CC: Harsh Azad , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks References: <1189089521.6161.53.camel@archimedes> <1189103360.6161.68.camel@archimedes> In-Reply-To: <1189103360.6161.68.camel@archimedes> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/97 X-Sequence-Number: 26642 On 6-9-2007 20:29 Mark Lewis wrote: > Maybe I'm jaded by past experiences, but the only real use case I can > see to justify a SAN for a database would be something like Oracle RAC, > but I'm not aware of any PG equivalent to that. PG Cluster II seems to be able to do that, but I don't know whether that's production quality already... Arjen