Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C75C9F9B48 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:54:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54546-04 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:53:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959799F9A47 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:54:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l88GrVVh015906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:53:32 -0700 Message-ID: <46E2D38A.6070607@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:53:30 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner CC: Gregory Stark , Simon Riggs , Bernd Helmle , mfatticcioni@mbigroup.it, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: DRBD and Postgres: how to improve the perfomance? References: <2C070D1C3970467FF64F6B6A@imhotep.credativ.de> <1189232904.4281.19.camel@ebony.site> <87k5r1zd52.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <46E2CAAF.50205@commandprompt.com> <46E2CEF3.1030908@kaltenbrunner.cc> In-Reply-To: <46E2CEF3.1030908@kaltenbrunner.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4194/Fri Sep 7 21:33:29 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/148 X-Sequence-Number: 26693 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Gregory Stark wrote: >>> "Simon Riggs" writes: >>>> You're right, but the distinction is a small one. What are the chances >>>> of losing two independent servers within a few milliseconds of each >>>> other? >>> If they're on the same power bus? >> That chance is minuscule or at least should be. Of course we are >> assuming some level of conditioned power that is independent of the >> power bus, e.g; a UPS. > > how is that making it different in practise ? - if both are on the same > UPS they are affectively on the same power bus ... Well I was thinking the bus that is in the wall. I would assume that people were smart enough to have independent UPS systems for each server. city power->line conditioning generator->panel->plug->UPS->server wash, rinse repeat. > If the UPS fails (or the generator is not kicking in which happens way > more often than people would believe) they could still fail at the very > same time .... Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > Stefan > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG4tOKATb/zqfZUUQRAiSTAJ4pqQqsP7aH9GPJYjY3hZDvKzU8cACeKKJ3 wAae0tl2XswsjgEncIsOBlw= =xsGZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----