Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF1D9F9CA2 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:42:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66788-06 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:42:30 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:16:01.029307 by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from relay.icomedias.com (relay.icomedias.com [62.99.232.66]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621189F9A7A for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:42:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.192.17.128] ([10.192.17.128]) by relay.icomedias.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l8BI8oJK009229; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: <46E6DDBA.1060507@sime.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:26:02 +0200 From: Mario Weilguni User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Riggs CC: mfatticcioni@mbigroup.it, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: DRBD and Postgres: how to improve the perfomance? References: <46E11BE4.6060500@mbigroup.it> <1189191616.4281.1.camel@ebony.site> In-Reply-To: <1189191616.4281.1.camel@ebony.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 10.192.64.104 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/189 X-Sequence-Number: 26734 Simon Riggs schrieb: > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 11:37 +0200, Maila Fatticcioni wrote: > >> protocol C; > > Try protocol B instead. > Sure? I've always heard that there has yet to be a case found, where B is better than C. We use DRBD with protocol C, and are quite happy with it.