Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F49F9C0F for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:48:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40003-02 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:48:04 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mail.emolecules.com (66-226-76-106.dedicated.abac.net [66.226.76.106]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA789F99A0 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:48:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 8362 invoked by uid 2020); 19 Sep 2007 13:54:29 -0700 Received: from wsip-68-224-174-233.sd.sd.cox.net (HELO moonunit3.moonview.localnet) (68.224.174.233) by 192.168.0.4 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2007 13:54:29 -0700 Message-ID: <46F18B6F.9070108@emolecules.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:49:51 -0700 From: Craig James User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlos Moreno CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Tablespaces and NFS References: <46F1471A.1010501@mochima.com> In-Reply-To: <46F1471A.1010501@mochima.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.208 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.107, BAYES_50=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200709/325 X-Sequence-Number: 26870 Carlos Moreno wrote: > Anyone has tried a setup combining tablespaces with NFS-mounted partitions? There has been some discussion of this recently, you can find it in the archives (http://archives.postgresql.org/). The word seems to be that NFS can lead to data corruption. Craig