Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C929FB5CF for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:57:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53379-08 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:57:46 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5A49FB5CD for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:57:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:57:49 -0500 Message-Id: <46F3E9ED.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:57:34 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: "Luiz K. Matsumura" , Cc: Subject: Re: Low CPU Usage References: <322942.8256.qm@web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <46F42C54.7070901@planit.com.br> In-Reply-To: <46F42C54.7070901@planit.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/390 X-Sequence-Number: 26935 >>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 3:40 PM, in message <46F42C54.7070901@planit.c= om.br>, "Luiz K. Matsumura" wrote:=20 =20 > but in suddenly the performance slow down. We noticed that the problem=20= > was with the time to connect with the server, that was very slow. =20 > I think that was some DNS problem (but not sure), because one time we=20 > cleared nameserver clauses in the /etc/resolv.conf the performance=20 > return to the normal. =20 You may have it there. In some versions of Java, on Windows, connection times are horribly slow unless the machine's IP address has a reverse DNS entry. Perhaps the new machine lacks such an entry, or there's a different version of Java in use? =20 -Kevin =20