Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65538633087
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 01:05:15 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 25884-01
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 04:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD1A632F66
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Jul 2010 01:05:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o62454Wx004704;
	Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? 
In-reply-to: <201007020300.o62300V21807@momjian.us> 
References: <201007020300.o62300V21807@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:00:00 -0400"
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:05:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4703.1278043504@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201007/17
X-Sequence-Number: 39406

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I would have liked to get to this for 9.0 but I feel it's a bit late
>> now.

> What do we want to do about the above issue?

TODO item.

			regards, tom lane