Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C559FBA40 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:31:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21859-07 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:31:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FE29FB262 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:31:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l26FVb17004707; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:31:37 -0500 (EST) To: "Craig A. James" cc: Bill Moran , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility In-reply-to: <45ED83C1.6000003@modgraph-usa.com> References: <45ECCFCA.2010501@presinet.com> <200703060222.l262MLi09584@momjian.us> <20070306084437.1f52c123.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <45ED83C1.6000003@modgraph-usa.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Craig A. James" message dated "Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:07:45 -0800" Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:31:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4706.1173195097@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.06 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/131 X-Sequence-Number: 23536 "Craig A. James" writes: > Bill Moran wrote: >> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few >> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email >> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is >> undefined. > No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both > parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your > statement. To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving mail list submissions goes. On the other hand, accepting a patch is another matter. regards, tom lane