Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80A79F99E3 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:38:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90619-03 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:38:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6B49F99C3 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:38:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.251] ([71.251.196.74]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JRA00G1EZP9F810@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:36:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:38:23 -0500 From: Jean-David Beyer Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows. In-reply-to: <16627.1194714491@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: pgsql performance Message-id: <4735FA9F.1080805@verizon.net> Organization: Institute for Regimented Whimsey MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 References: <4735DBDB.5050208@verizon.net> <16627.1194714491@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070317) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/164 X-Sequence-Number: 27579 Tom Lane wrote: > Jean-David Beyer writes: >> I am doing lots of INSERTs on a table that starts out empty (I did a >> TRUNCATE on it). I am not, AFAIK, doing DELETEs or UPDATEs. Autovacuum is >> on. I moved logging up to debug2 level to see what was going on, and I get >> things like this: > >> "vl_as": scanned 3000 of 5296 pages, containing 232944 live rows and 1033 >> dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 411224 estimated total rows > >> A little later, it says: > >> "vl_as": scanned 3000 of 6916 pages, containing 233507 live rows and 493 >> dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 538311 estimated total rows > > Well, *something* is doing deletes or updates in that table. Better > look a bit harder at your application ... > OK, you agree that if I am doing only INSERTs, that there should not be any dead rows. Therefore, I _must_ be doing deletes or updates. But the program is pretty simple, and I see no UPDATEs or DELETEs. I searched all the program source files (that contain none of them) and all the libraries I have written, and they have none either. Right now the programs are not to the state where UPDATEs or DELETEs are required (though they will be later). I am still developing them and it is easier to just restore from backup or start over from the beginning since most of the changes are data laundering from an ever-increasing number of spreadsheets. Am I right that TRUNCATE deletes all the rows of a table. They may then be still there, but would not autovacuum clean out the dead rows? Or maybe it has not gotten to them yet? I could do an explicit one earlier. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 13:10:01 up 18 days, 6:28, 7 users, load average: 4.46, 4.34, 4.23