pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedBenchmarking PG
4+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Benchmarking PG
@ 2007-12-11 11:06 Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
2007-12-11 11:16 ` Re: Benchmarking PG Josh Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
2007-12-11 12:11 ` Re: Benchmarking PG Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manolo _ @ 2007-12-11 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
Hi to all.
I'd like to benchmark PG. I'd like to compare sorting performances (time spent, #of disk accesses, # of run produced etc) of the present Replacement Selection (external sorting) algorithm and of a refinement I'm going to implement.
I'm new on PG, I just had the idea of how to possibly get better that algorithm and choosed to test it on PG since it's an open-source DBMS.
I've been searching the web for a benchmark. I suppose TPC-H and Wisconsin could fit, but had problems when trying to use them.
Any suggestion on a "good benchmark"?
Any tutorial on how to use them?
Thanks for your time.
Regards.
Manolo.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Benchmarking PG
2007-12-11 11:06 Benchmarking PG Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
@ 2007-12-11 11:16 ` Josh Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
2007-12-11 11:36 ` Re: Benchmarking PG Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josh Tolley @ 2007-12-11 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>; +Cc: pgsql-performance
On Dec 11, 2007 4:06 AM, Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it> wrote:
>
> Hi to all.
>
> I'd like to benchmark PG. I'd like to compare sorting performances (time spent, #of disk accesses, # of run produced etc) of the present Replacement Selection (external sorting) algorithm and of a refinement I'm going to implement.
>
> I'm new on PG, I just had the idea of how to possibly get better that algorithm and choosed to test it on PG since it's an open-source DBMS.
>
> I've been searching the web for a benchmark. I suppose TPC-H and Wisconsin could fit, but had problems when trying to use them.
> Any suggestion on a "good benchmark"?
> Any tutorial on how to use them?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards.
> Manolo.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
Well, there's pgbench. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/pgbench.html
- Josh / eggyknap
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Benchmarking PG
2007-12-11 11:06 Benchmarking PG Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
2007-12-11 11:16 ` Re: Benchmarking PG Josh Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
@ 2007-12-11 11:36 ` Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manolo _ @ 2007-12-11 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
Hi Josh!
Thanks for your reply.
Actually I forgot to mention PGBench, sorry. But I also forgot to mention I'm looking for an "impartial"... I mean "outer" tool to test PG.
Any suggestion, please?
Regards.
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:16:02 -0700
> From: eggyknap@gmail.com
> To: mac_man2005@hotmail.it
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking PG
> CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 4:06 AM, Manolo _ wrote:
>>
>> Hi to all.
>>
>> I'd like to benchmark PG. I'd like to compare sorting performances (time spent, #of disk accesses, # of run produced etc) of the present Replacement Selection (external sorting) algorithm and of a refinement I'm going to implement.
>>
>> I'm new on PG, I just had the idea of how to possibly get better that algorithm and choosed to test it on PG since it's an open-source DBMS.
>>
>> I've been searching the web for a benchmark. I suppose TPC-H and Wisconsin could fit, but had problems when trying to use them.
>> Any suggestion on a "good benchmark"?
>> Any tutorial on how to use them?
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> Regards.
>> Manolo.
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
>> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>>
>
> Well, there's pgbench. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/pgbench.html
>
> - Josh / eggyknap
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Benchmarking PG
2007-12-11 11:06 Benchmarking PG Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
@ 2007-12-11 12:11 ` Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heikki Linnakangas @ 2007-12-11 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>; +Cc: pgsql-performance
Manolo _ wrote:
> I'd like to benchmark PG. I'd like to compare sorting performances (time spent, #of disk accesses, # of run produced etc) of the present Replacement Selection (external sorting) algorithm and of a refinement I'm going to implement.
>
> I'm new on PG, I just had the idea of how to possibly get better that algorithm and choosed to test it on PG since it's an open-source DBMS.
>
> I've been searching the web for a benchmark. I suppose TPC-H and Wisconsin could fit, but had problems when trying to use them.
> Any suggestion on a "good benchmark"?
> Any tutorial on how to use them?
If you want to compare sorting performance in particular, running a big
query that needs a big sort will be much more useful than a generic DBMS
benchmark like TPC-H.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-11 12:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-11 11:06 Benchmarking PG Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
2007-12-11 11:16 ` Josh Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>
2007-12-11 11:36 ` Manolo _ <mac_man2005@hotmail.it>
2007-12-11 12:11 ` Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox