Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0802E0149 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:08:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05761-05 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:08:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail-relay.rwa-net.co.uk (mail-relay.rwa-net.co.uk [62.189.139.18]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC33B2E0153 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:08:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from saturn.rwa-net.co.uk (saturn.rwa-net.co.uk [62.189.139.33]) by mail-relay.rwa-net.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F87D61E1 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:48:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] by saturn.rwa-net.co.uk (GMS 14.01.3539/NT4698.00.83343e8d) with ESMTP id rxnfgaaa for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:08:03 +0000 Message-ID: <475FC113.7040103@rwa-net.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:08:03 +0000 From: Matthew Lunnon Reply-To: mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk Organization: RWA User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Lunnon , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Limited performance on multi core server References: <475FB50B.8060701@rwa-net.co.uk> <20071212103926.GB5247@uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20071212103926.GB5247@uio.no> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010405020509000004080402" X-AuthenticatedSender: mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk X-Info: UNKNOWN-USER X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/167 X-Sequence-Number: 27983 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010405020509000004080402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ah I was afraid of that. Maybe I'll have to come out of the dark ages. Matthew Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:16:43AM +0000, Matthew Lunnon wrote: > >> Does anyone have any ideas what my bottle neck might be and what I can do >> about it? >> > > Your bottleneck is that you are using a very old version of PostgreSQL. Try > 8.2 or (if you can) the 8.3 beta series -- it scales a _lot_ better in this > kind of situation. > > /* Steinar */ > -- Matthew Lunnon Technical Consultant RWA Ltd. mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)29 2081 5056 www.rwa-net.co.uk -- --------------010405020509000004080402 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ah I was afraid of that.  Maybe I'll have to come out of the dark ages.

Matthew

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:16:43AM +0000, Matthew Lunnon wrote:
  
Does anyone have any ideas what my bottle neck might be and what I can do 
about it?
    

Your bottleneck is that you are using a very old version of PostgreSQL. Try
8.2 or (if you can) the 8.3 beta series -- it scales a _lot_ better in this
kind of situation.

/* Steinar */
  

-- 
Matthew Lunnon
Technical Consultant
RWA Ltd.

 mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk
 Tel: +44 (0)29 2081 5056
 www.rwa-net.co.uk
--
--------------010405020509000004080402--