Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C747D2E0320 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:16:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34200-02-4 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:16:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057352E3442 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:15:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.226] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBDHAbp9024751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:10:37 -0800 Message-ID: <47616796.4010405@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:10:46 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Riggs CC: mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Limited performance on multi core server References: <475FB50B.8060701@rwa-net.co.uk> <20071212103926.GB5247@uio.no> <475FC113.7040103@rwa-net.co.uk> <4760006C.1070402@commandprompt.com> <1197563025.4255.1835.camel@ebony.site> In-Reply-To: <1197563025.4255.1835.camel@ebony.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:10:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/191 X-Sequence-Number: 28007 Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 07:38 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Matthew Lunnon wrote: >>> Ah I was afraid of that. Maybe I'll have to come out of the dark ages. >> Yes :) but ignore the comment about the 8.3 Beta series. It is Beta for >> a reason, that means testing only, no production. > > Matthew, > > Some benchmark comparisons would be really useful though, so please > don't be dissuaded from looking at 8.3. Right, I did say "testing" which is always good. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake