Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7412E3C74 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:12:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67510-09-2 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:11:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567A22E3472 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:12:05 -0400 (AST) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so777442nfh.23 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=h/K6FyC+xcbzceDGLlHt+YJpna1qduFcU/Gd4sjLlIA=; b=cnqPALtSjBaMGqtTUZsuFC0fkn/fjLE062hOr5GT9obpWEnSuLVJC1xrGyBXzmM21paq1Y2xRKLMZcsxAjvzAtY20rIclSdeNdI8LXdAqfJxzhCNfU8PGZv7d4fndZCUkVSRHQjKiSE1i6fCUXfw758+tQlSl4dru+6LNmaTgvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=SVsvGzy7nZiGSJ15yjC//OuEbiLiMxUD06OIFuB0Gh92M6p4UXzeEgJ4AVVQXAxjWDtSgM1K2AM1BZ4sAx2pbYY2Ct3rEU7NWMmcc/+L8+OOL4xxq031g2Mqy/jaFPWZx99uf4jN5fRFP3/rCIX+bioJBXsW2VC7+cY0F8rpZ6s= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr8366546bud.20.1197630723043; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.24.32.184? ( [62.232.55.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c24sm10605882ika.2007.12.14.03.11.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:12:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <476264FE.8050101@enterprisedb.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:11:58 +0000 From: Heikki Linnakangas User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mlunnon@rwa-net.co.uk CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Limited performance on multi core server References: <475FB50B.8060701@rwa-net.co.uk> <20071212103926.GB5247@uio.no> <475FC113.7040103@rwa-net.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <475FC113.7040103@rwa-net.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/209 X-Sequence-Number: 28025 Matthew Lunnon wrote: > Ah I was afraid of that. Maybe I'll have to come out of the dark ages. At the very least, upgrade to latest 7.4 minor version. It probably won't help with you're performance, but 7.4.3 is very old. There's been a *lot* of bug fixes between 7.4.3 and 7.4.18, including fixes for security vulnerabilities and data corruption bugs. > Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:16:43AM +0000, Matthew Lunnon wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have any ideas what my bottle neck might be and what I >>> can do about it? >>> >> >> Your bottleneck is that you are using a very old version of >> PostgreSQL. Try >> 8.2 or (if you can) the 8.3 beta series -- it scales a _lot_ better in >> this >> kind of situation. >> >> /* Steinar */ >> > -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com