Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BC52E33D9 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:05:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53333-06 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:05:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2862E33CF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:05:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from snake.edbuk ([62.232.55.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBI95QJh000633 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:05:27 GMT Message-ID: <47678D56.6070903@postgresql.org> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:05:26 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Bernabe CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005) References: <712109.35451.qm@web51610.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <712109.35451.qm@web51610.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/264 X-Sequence-Number: 28080 Robert Bernabe wrote: > I'm happy (actually ecstatic) to report that Win2kPro + PG performance > is slightly faster than Win2kPro + MSSQL/MSDE. > > Linux(FC7) + PG 8.x performance seems to be 3x faster than Win2KPro + > MSSQL/MSDE for our stored functions. > > Thanks for all the help! Am a believer now. :) That's great news Robert - thanks for sharing! Regards, Dave.