Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D052E32E3
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 20:57:53 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 93628-01-3
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 20:57:49 -0400 (AST)
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BA32E308D
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  4 Feb 2008 20:57:44 -0400 (AST)
Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79])
	by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	m150vhEj005875
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:57:43 GMT
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
	id <0JVQ00601QK3M000@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from
	J.K.Shah@Sun.COM) for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org;
	Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:57:43 -0700 (MST)
Received: from jignesh-shahs-computer.local ([98.216.54.79])
	by mail-amer.sun.com
	(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
	with ESMTPSA id <0JVQ000YUQO6T520@mail-amer.sun.com>; Mon,
	04 Feb 2008 17:57:43 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:57:52 -0500
From: "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Benchmark Data requested
In-reply-to: <87y7a045p7.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Message-id: <47A7B490.6010906@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <1202150236.4252.521.camel@ebony.site> <47A792BE.80804@sun.com>
	<87y7a045p7.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200802/22
X-Sequence-Number: 28564



Gregory Stark wrote:
> Incidentally we found some cases that Solaris was particularly bad at. Is
> there anybody in particular that would be interested in hearing about them?
> (Not meant to be a knock on Solaris, I'm sure there are other cases Linux or
> BSD handle poorly too)
>
>
>   

Send me the details, I can file bugs for Solaris on behalf of the 
community. Since I am involved in lot of PostgreSQL testing on Solaris 
this year, I have a small list myself (mostly related to file system 
stuff though).

I know one regarding bonnie rewriting blocks that you sent out. (I still 
havent done anything about it yet but finally have some test machines 
for such work instead of using my workstation to test it out :-)

But I am really interested in seeing which one hits PostgreSQL 
performance/usability.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Jignesh