DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=CtD1jGePh2wFMTJNw926Y5FvVDt7z9afjAirrXiv89jYPTiQG2jIt8dmcIJopmDTrpmsCX0UDb6UJxxiKayqTCS9v4CpTQ02jfr1oudq+TWfkNe23dUobiptS5fUFvEe82khF6n3AyVg2f84nZjLd4yT3XZfkhlPQSr8tN4ubbE=
Message-ID: <4804C4D2.5020603@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:08:02 +0200
From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: shared_buffers performance
References: <48032021.90704@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48032021.90704@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Hi all,
> I started to do some performance tests (using pgbench) in order to
> estimate the DRBD impact on our servers, my plan was to perform some
> benchmarks without DRBD in order to compare the same benchmark with
> DRBD.
> I didn't perform yet the benchmark with DRBD and I'm already facing
> something I can not explain (I performed at the moment only reads test).
> 
> I'm using postgres 8.2.3 on Red Hat compiled with GCC 3.4.6.
> 
> I'm using pgbench with scaling factor with a range [1:500], my server
> has 4 cores so I'm trying with 16 client and 4000 transaction per
> client: pgbench -t 4000 -c 16 -S db_perf. I did 3 session using 3 different
> values of shared_buffers: 64MB, 256MB, 512MB  and my server has 2GB.
> 
> The following graph reports the results:
> 
> http://img84.imageshack.us/my.php?image=totalid7.png
> 
> as you can see using 64MB as value for shared_buffers I'm obtaining better
> results. Is this something expected or I'm looking in the wrong direction?
> I'm going to perform same tests without using the -S option in pgbench but
> being a time expensive operation I would like to ear your opinion first.

I have complete today the other benchmarks using pgbench in write mode as well,
and the following graph resumes the results:

http://img440.imageshack.us/my.php?image=totalwbn0.png

what I can say here the trend is the opposite seen on the read only mode as
increasing the shared_buffers increases the TPS.

I still didn't upgrade to 8.2.7 as suggested by Greg Smith because I would like
to compare the results obtained till now with the new one (simulations running
while I write) using postgres on a "DRBD partition"; sure as soon the current
tests terminate I will upgrade postgres.

If you have any suggestions on what you would like to see/know, just let me know.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola