Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B3C2E0055 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 11:22:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31363-03 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 11:22:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DA32E003B for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 11:22:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m41EMaPT011056 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 14:22:36 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0K0700C01093BB00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from J.K.Shah@Sun.COM) for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 May 2008 08:22:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.168.2] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0K07001NJ19MNQD0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Thu, 01 May 2008 08:22:35 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 10:21:10 -0400 From: "Jignesh K. Shah" Subject: Re: Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL In-reply-to: <20080428135527.554f6e2f@jd-laptop> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Gregory Stark , Josh Berkus , Euler Taveira de Oliveira , Greg Smith , postgres performance list Message-id: <4819D1D6.90905@sun.com> Organization: Sun Microsystems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <480F8C2D.6010806@emproshunts.com> <4811D1DD.9030401@otg-nc.com> <20080425130105.GA19447@crankycanuck.ca> <36e682920804250741p33d621f3gf35e6bdebe2e0531@mail.gmail.com> <20080425152053.GE19447@crankycanuck.ca> <481278E7.9030504@timbira.com> <87wsmlm90e.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <4814BDB8.2030108@agliodbs.com> <877iei9w4r.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <4815F648.9050901@agliodbs.com> <873ap5akme.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <20080428135527.554f6e2f@jd-laptop> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080119) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/9 X-Sequence-Number: 29977 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:40:25 -0400 > Gregory Stark wrote: > > > >> We certainly can pass TPC-C. I'm curious what you mean by 1/4 though? >> On similar hardware? Or the maximum we can scale to is 1/4 as large >> as Oracle? Can you point me to the actual benchmark runs you're >> referring to? >> > > I would be curious as well considering there has been zero evidence > provided to make such a statement. I am not saying it isn't true, it > wouldn't be surprising to me if Oracle outperformed PostgreSQL in TPC-C > but I would sure like to see in general how wel we do (or don't). > > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > I am sorry but I am far from catching my emails: Best thing is to work with TPC-E benchmarks involving the community. (TPC-C requirements is way too high on storage and everybody seems to be getting on the TPC-E bandwagon slowly.) Where can I get the latest DBT5 (TPC-E) kit ? Using the kit should allow me to recreate setups which can then be made available for various PostgreSQL Performance engineers to look at it. Regards, Jignesh