Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E77A2E0056
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 May 2008 08:29:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05865-10
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@developer.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 May 2008 08:29:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])
	by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3170A2E004F
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 May 2008 08:29:19 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])
	by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m44BTEGn010992
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 4 May 2008 08:29:14 -0300 (ADT)
	(envelope-from news@news.hub.org)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m44BD4xa000512
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org;
	Sun, 4 May 2008 08:13:04 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news)
From: Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: Re: pgPool query cache
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 13:13:07 +0200
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <481D9A43.7070706@theendofthetunnel.de>
References: 
 <5d64c3ea-e004-4891-b2f0-0fca5a4ab813@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
	<43f1ee06-b8ca-4abe-83eb-c4c2c1cf9d8c@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
To: Rauan Maemirov <rauan1987@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
In-Reply-To: <43f1ee06-b8ca-4abe-83eb-c4c2c1cf9d8c@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200805/44
X-Sequence-Number: 30012

Rauan Maemirov wrote:
>> I want to ask, if anyone used query_cache of pgPool. The problem is
>> there is no detailed installation steps on how to configure it
>> correctly. Itried to follow it, but guess that it doesn't cache my
>> queries. So, maybe someone adviced me or give link.
> 
> Nobody use??

I'd say caching is better done on a higher level -- like HTML fragments 
or what ever you generate from those queries..

Just my two cent.


-- 
Best regards,
Hannes Dorbath