Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C437BD74 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:37:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36619-09 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:36:54 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [129.240.10.57]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985937BD40 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:36:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlJg0-0004nP-Vk; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:36:48 +0200 Received: from inhaca.uio.no ([129.240.6.208]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlJg0-0003Yl-Rc; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:36:48 +0200 Message-ID: <48E48822.5060009@usit.uio.no> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:36:50 +0200 From: Tommy Gildseth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Huxton CC: paul@wayr.org, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: dedicated server & postgresql 8.1 conf tunning References: <48E360D0.8080403@archonet.com> <6439bfe8d4afed3a360b906353c7e9e5@localhost> <48E4865F.3010807@archonet.com> In-Reply-To: <48E4865F.3010807@archonet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, MISSING_SUBJECT=0.001, NO_RECEIVED=-0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 9433506D39E54B5432E40681D22F38DA4FAFB4A5 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.6.208 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 130 max/h 3 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/14 X-Sequence-Number: 31595 Richard Huxton wrote: > paul@wayr.org wrote: >> Thanks, >> >> Unfornatly, i can't update pgsql to 8.3 since it's not in debian stable. > > That's why backports.org was invented :-) > Or does can't mean "not allowed to"? Well, running production servers from backports can be a risky proposition too, and can land you in situations like the one discussed in "Debian packages for Postgres 8.2" from the General list. -- Tommy Gildseth