Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4CC65014A for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:38:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02379-04 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:37:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from batyskaf.batory.org.pl (mail.batory.org.pl [62.89.72.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15376650172 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:37:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from pancernik.batory.org.pl (pancernik.batory.lan [192.168.30.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by batyskaf.batory.org.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9H9bnME027379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:37:49 +0200 Message-ID: <48F85CED.7000009@batory.org.pl> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:37:49 +0200 From: Tomasz Ostrowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWlra2VsIEjDuGdo?= CC: pgsql-general Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? References: <7438A981-4B6A-4E5A-A1E0-50432CDEFB00@hoegh.org> <48F6EE94.8010904@batory.org.pl> <4BE94DFB-8917-4175-9083-7DEABC30BD7F@hoegh.org> <48F70157.7010601@batory.org.pl> <20081016144046.GH4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <10268b3e0810160809l3f16fba3k1d45271fbbe865b@mail.gmail.com> <20081016152647.GI4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <4F39EAE4-2C57-4839-8AB7-98AC131C0C4A@hoegh.org> In-Reply-To: <4F39EAE4-2C57-4839-8AB7-98AC131C0C4A@hoegh.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 192.168.30.2 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/735 X-Sequence-Number: 138984 On 2008-10-16 23:17, Mikkel Høgh wrote: > P.S.: Why are e-mails from this list not sent with a Reply-To: header > of the lists e-mail-address? Because it is dangerous - too easy to send to the list, when you really mean to send to one. Most e-mail programs have two buttons for replying: ordinary "Reply" and "Reply to all". You're supposed to use "Reply to all" if you want to reply to the list. You are using BCC (blind carbon copy) instead of CC (carbon copy) to the list address in your e-mails and you break this functionality. Regards Tometzky -- ...although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you were... Winnie the Pooh