Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E854F650140 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:25:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11501-09 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:25:01 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from batyskaf.batory.org.pl (mail.batory.org.pl [62.89.72.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9383965013E for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:24:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from pancernik.batory.org.pl (pancernik.batory.lan [192.168.30.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by batyskaf.batory.org.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9HAOkM0029580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:24:47 +0200 Message-ID: <48F867EE.5040403@batory.org.pl> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:24:46 +0200 From: Tomasz Ostrowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWlra2VsIEjDuGdo?= CC: pgsql-general Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? References: <7438A981-4B6A-4E5A-A1E0-50432CDEFB00@hoegh.org> <48F6EE94.8010904@batory.org.pl> <4BE94DFB-8917-4175-9083-7DEABC30BD7F@hoegh.org> <48F70157.7010601@batory.org.pl> <20081016144046.GH4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <10268b3e0810160809l3f16fba3k1d45271fbbe865b@mail.gmail.com> <20081016152647.GI4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <4F39EAE4-2C57-4839-8AB7-98AC131C0C4A@hoegh.org> <48F85CED.7000009@batory.org.pl> <6D3E0C6E-B2F4-4BAF-92E0-46C4EAE4D51B@hoegh.org> In-Reply-To: <6D3E0C6E-B2F4-4BAF-92E0-46C4EAE4D51B@hoegh.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 192.168.30.2 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/737 X-Sequence-Number: 138986 On 2008-10-17 12:13, Mikkel Høgh wrote: >> You're supposed to use "Reply to all" if you want to reply to the >> list. > > Well, I think the most common use case for a mailing list is to reply > back to the list, isn't that the whole point? It is a point of having "Reply to all" button. With "reply-to" is it hard to reply to one person, easy to reply to the list. Without it it is both easy. > Personally I find it annoying that I get two copies of each reply to > one of my posts, one that is filtered into the mailinglist folder > because it has the correct X-Mailing-List header and the other just > sits there in my inbox, wasting both bandwidth and disk space in the > process. So set reply-to in messages you send by yourself - it will be honored. > Besides, the if the Reply-To thing is so dangerous, why do most other > mailing lists do it? for i in Windows MySQL IE Sweets Alcohol etc.; do echo "If using $i is so dangerous, why do most do it?" done Regards Tometzky -- ...although Eating Honey was a very good thing to do, there was a moment just before you began to eat it which was better than when you were... Winnie the Pooh