Message-ID: <4900C30A.8030604@kkmfg.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:31:38 -0400
From: Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
References: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
	<4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com> <200810232009.04806.clist@uah.es>
In-Reply-To: <200810232009.04806.clist@uah.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Angel Alvarez wrote:
> What's such most advanced mail reader??
>
> No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
> By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, reply to list) 
> in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message. 
>
> in fact many other mail-list dont have such extended features, as not all of the 
> previous 4 options works as expected. For me this makes postgres lists the most
> complete about the RFC.
>
> So is about, thunderbird to move forward one step, not to cripple standars back.
> In fact this remembers me the M$ way of doing things..
>
> Regards, Angel
>
>
>   

One could argue that a standard which is respected by nobody but a few 
people from this list is NOT a standard but rather a botched attempt at 
creating a standard which no one wanted.