Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4A2650428 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:48:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12465-04 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:48:37 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EC56503FB for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:48:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:48:36 -0600 Message-Id: <49395B57.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.3 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:48:23 -0600 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: , "Mario Weilguni" Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives? References: <4934FE60.30702@sime.com> In-Reply-To: <4934FE60.30702@sime.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200812/44 X-Sequence-Number: 32080 >>> Mario Weilguni wrote: > Has anyone benchmarked this controller (PCIe/4x, 512 MB BBC)? We try to > use it with 8x SATA 1TB drives in RAID-5 mode under Linux, and measure > strange values. An individual drive is capable of delivering 91 MB/sec > sequential read performance, and we get values ~102MB/sec out of a > 8-drive RAID5, seems to be ridiculous slow. Write performance seems to > be much better, ~300 MB /sec - seems ok to me. What's your stripe size? -Kevin