Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BE263322D for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:18:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16449-09 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:18:26 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B623C632A40 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:18:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:18:26 -0500 Message-Id: <49BA40FB.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.3 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:18:19 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: "Jignesh K. Shah" Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" , "Scott Carey" Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 References: <49BA53CF.4020702@sun.com> <49BA742D.3050203@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <49BA742D.3050203@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200903/162 X-Sequence-Number: 33084 >>> "Jignesh K. Shah" wrote: > 600: 80: Medium Throughput: 82632.000 Avg Medium Resp: 0.005 Personally, I'd be pretty interested in seeing what the sampling shows in a steady state at this level. Any blocking at this level which wasn't waiting for input or output in communications with the client software would probably something to look at very closely. -Kevin