Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E87632771 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:42:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81048-04 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:42:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:16:06.168675 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qy0-f190.google.com (mail-qy0-f190.google.com [209.85.221.190]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E06323AF for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:42:23 -0400 (AST) Received: by qyk28 with SMTP id 28so12990856qyk.28 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:42:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.7.130 with SMTP id d2mr1328579qad.217.1263503949365; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.78? (rrcs-64-183-7-130.west.biz.rr.com [64.183.7.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm357773ywf.35.2010.01.14.13.19.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:19:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B4F8A49.7010906@emolecules.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:19:05 -0800 From: Craig James User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlo Stonebanks CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Massive table (500M rows) update nightmare References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.169 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.984, BAYES_40=-0.185 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201001/315 X-Sequence-Number: 37195 Carlo Stonebanks wrote: > Guys, I want to thank you for all of the advice - my client has just > made a surprise announcement that he would like to set start from > scratch with a new server, so I am afraid that all of this great advice > has to be seen in the context of whatever decision is made on that. I am > out there, hat-in-hand, looking for advice under the PERFORM post: "New > server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?" You might start this as a new topic with a relevant title, and reiterate your database requirements. Otherwise it will get submerged as just a footnote to your original question. It's really nice to be able to quickly find the new-equipment discussions. Craig