Message-ID: <4B87C6A5.6040005@archonet.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:03:33 +0000
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100213 Lightning/1.0b1 Shredder/3.0.2pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: elias ghanem <e.ghanem@acteos.com>
CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Multiple data base on same server
References: <201002261242.o1QCgoka009150@relay-ext.ornis.com>
In-Reply-To: <201002261242.o1QCgoka009150@relay-ext.ornis.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 26/02/10 12:45, elias ghanem wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for your answer,
> Concerning the second point, each db have different table that are logically
> related (for ex, tables for configuration, tables for business...) plus I'm
> planning to put the indexes on their own tablespaces.
> Concerning the disks I will maybe stored on multiple disks (but surely not
> 200-300). So I'm just wondering If this big number of tablespaces on a same
> db server may cause problems,

If the tablespaces aren't on different disks, I'm not sure what the 
point is.

Do you perhaps mean schemas? So you have e.g. a "system" schema with 
tables "users", "activity_log" etc? There's no problem with 20-30 
schemas per database.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd