Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2946356BE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:17:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41450-02-7 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:16:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:56.701228 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.beccati.com (ispeed-srv6.housing.tomato.it [213.92.90.60]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C4F637A5F for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:37:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 83497 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 18:30:39 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.202?) (matteo@beccati.com@88.149.176.119) by mail.beccati.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 16:30:39 -0000 Message-ID: <4BB2272F.8000408@beccati.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:30:39 +0200 From: Matteo Beccati User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; it; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ireneusz Pluta CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID References: <4BB1FAAF.7050406@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <4BB1FAAF.7050406@wp.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.808 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.809, BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/396 X-Sequence-Number: 38221 Hi, > I am waiting for an ordered machine dedicated to PostgresSQL. It was > expected to have 3ware 9650SE 16 port controller. However, the vendor > wants to replace this controller with MegaRAID SAS 84016E, because, as > they say, they have it on stock, while 3ware would be available in a few > weeks. > > Is this a good replace, generally? > Will it run on FreeBSD, specifically? Not sure about that specific controller, but I do have a Fujitsu rebranded "RAID Ctrl SAS onboard 256MB iTBBU LSI" that works pretty good on my FreeBSD 6.2 box with the mfi driver. Getting the megacli tool took some effort as it involves having Linux emulation running but it's now working fine. I wouldn't dare to use it for write operations as I remember it freezing the box just after upgrading to amd64 (it was working good on i386). Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/