Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F92D632414
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:52:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 80895-07
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:52:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from glacier.frostconsultingllc.com (glacier.frostconsultingllc.com
	[69.36.227.170])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCBB6321E7
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:52:17 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from dsl081-245-111.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.245.111]
	helo=Sidney-Stratton.local)
	by glacier.frostconsultingllc.com with esmtpsa
	(TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <josh@agliodbs.com>)
	id 1O2Xus-0002Gl-A1; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:52:12 -0700
Message-ID: <4BC79899.4030107@agliodbs.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:52:09 -0700
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Autovaccum with cost_delay does not complete on one
	solaris 5.10 machine
References: <4BC76C9F.1020200@agliodbs.com>
	<20100415200056.GJ7259@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<16088.1271362441@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20100415202405.GL7259@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<4BC79072.10901@agliodbs.com> <26178.1271371697@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <26178.1271371697@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.847 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.053,
	BAYES_00=-1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201004/196
X-Sequence-Number: 38446


> Josh, are you sure that both servers are identical in terms of both
> GUC-related and per-table autovacuum settings?

I should check per-table.  GUC, yes, because the company has source
management for config files.

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com