Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E43F632EF4 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20989-05 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:06:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [202.78.240.40]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8947E63266D for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:06:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA966843B for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:06:36 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at catalyst.net.nz Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWI0o2dRIQ6R for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:06:36 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:15ff:fe5c:2471] (unknown [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:15ff:fe5c:2471]) (Authenticated sender: mark.kirkwood) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C3B1683BF for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:06:36 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <4C05CABC.3020905@catalyst.net.nz> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:06:36 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: File system choice for Red Hat systems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.79 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/12 X-Sequence-Number: 38868 I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This apparently means that the xfs tools are only available via special channels. What are Red Hat using people choosing for a good performing filesystem? regards Mark