Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB2633115 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:41:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63373-01 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:41:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [202.78.240.40]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52649632F2D for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:41:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091D0683BF; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:41:29 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at catalyst.net.nz Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILs0AU7BW+5K; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:41:28 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:15ff:fe5c:2471] (unknown [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:222:15ff:fe5c:2471]) (Authenticated sender: mark.kirkwood) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 822EA338FB; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:41:28 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <4C05D2E8.7090709@catalyst.net.nz> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:41:28 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems References: <4C05CABC.3020905@catalyst.net.nz> <14604.1275449196@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <14604.1275449196@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/14 X-Sequence-Number: 38870 On 02/06/10 15:26, Tom Lane wrote: > > What's your time horizon? RHEL6 will have full support for xfs. > On RHEL5 I really wouldn't consider anything except ext3. > > Yeah, RHEL6 seems like the version we would prefer - unfortunately time frame is the next few days. Awesome - thanks for the quick reply! regards Mark