Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B88632AEE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:53:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37934-02 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:53:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989C2632A47 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:53:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=jaVrmd1xHCkA:10 a=1CvaPgNKC-EA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=rVeD6LHJMvzmNE7TiTAA:9 a=IPDrO2MXsFSUBid7fB6OKnn4hf4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 98.27.48.207 Received: from [98.27.48.207] ([98.27.48.207:56825] helo=[192.168.10.103]) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 44/E3-25132-9E2B61C4; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:53:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4C16B2E9.5090408@dunslane.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:53:29 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lacey Powers CC: Bruce Momjian , Alvaro Herrera , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL-development , "Joshua D. Drake" Subject: Re: Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled References: <201006142046.o5EKkBn25755@momjian.us> <4C16AFA6.2010303@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <4C16AFA6.2010303@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/853 X-Sequence-Number: 164483 Lacey Powers wrote: >> >> Do any of the other minor releases made at the same time have this >> problem, or just 8.4.4? > > The only ones affected were 8.4.4 for CentOS 5 x86_64 and i386. > > That also covers RHEL5 x86_64/i386, no? I assume you use the same RPMs for both. cheers andrew