Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4045632BA1 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:25:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64056-07-2 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com (mail-ew0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859C5632B3B for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:25:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so931551ewy.19 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:25:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d7TgsvgxdW3IYZDar+ZVVbBj3m8cTUJAjTH+XbOTrr4=; b=kBBDOhgl766dQw+awQj+VPvav1IcciUP76CWAv5xZ2c3kz8p1Nnq6Jl6jyLAt/bVMu zYQy9OMtVX+7t8YcdAiyHaoFyODrGbJdNoFYXUxS8Smv9M1Ei03weOgRqVSpfQPpISoV lVDbLKU9FNP2WV1V0A+Kfv3oJ5Gk5U2j0ekTY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JnkVAnjNYeT49GEbVB7NX+MuuByKa6qAuLQpK/dl2pbCzacCQ3h7nHooqS3o0w894f OruUyV6WhPzf+xiCEHfHvkjpjPpD4nxb/GtaWRS59jhgd/MMfy5t4W7bge+DM0dOl1Pc ZDjvTTIWI3meiopAyzcsW3+9pD3SCLveEn2Mg= Received: by 10.14.127.132 with SMTP id d4mr330062eei.78.1280161500774; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (5357DA75.cable.casema.nl [83.87.218.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm5938005eei.18.2010.07.26.09.24.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C4DB736.4020801@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:26:30 +0200 From: Yeb Havinga User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Wakeling CC: Greg Smith , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD References: <4C4A9452.9070100@gmail.com> <4C4B1F84.5030306@2ndquadrant.com> <4C4C83DF.3010703@gmail.com> <4C4C8CCC.7080406@gmail.com> <4C4DA982.5090308@2ndquadrant.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.001 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/382 X-Sequence-Number: 39771 Matthew Wakeling wrote: > Apologies, I was interpreting the graph as the latency of the device, > not all the layers in-between as well. There isn't any indication in > the email with the graph as to what the test conditions or software are. That info was in the email preceding the graph mail, but I see now I forgot to mention it was a 8.4.4 postgres version. regards, Yeb Havinga