Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FF56333BA for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:42:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37379-02 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:42:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com (mail-ew0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DE9632E9B for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:42:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so1007896ewy.19 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o1wyBnS2G02sqqoRDlpib4GA2+ghrFARP+fUs9rdeIQ=; b=nmIlPVsqqR0+wxHi/bwQNg2dxM1TJhNc6mXxgw6H8v4Max1Sncq272XP1fQ0/GPayB 0XZNZKw2biqvlI7Y2CeoThz5N6O7E0KEyH8Vt0nIZrUcdbXnBQwEHCVLlC5ubVQySDK+ PPTeUpO/OlABxqkT576cnlYj4cs6XNe2YuW+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nNr7nIFrCtikHxGC+nHhNRXmSW4p0kk+Km+KoVMuiHcHcbzXorTgUWy6U/tmz11swr XX8TmPgCXSrTgr83cIN+GP7hjlHC08ZPlnPnKQs7xAJNq2RPfl38tkCCLPDQpS61wIn8 WJg39FYP94SCryE118T2QPgjCjZENpYEim7Yc= Received: by 10.14.45.79 with SMTP id o55mr485625eeb.97.1280173334818; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (5357DA75.cable.casema.nl [83.87.218.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z55sm6221384eeh.9.2010.07.26.12.42.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C4DE571.5080405@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:43:45 +0200 From: Yeb Havinga User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Smith CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD References: <4C4A9452.9070100@gmail.com> <4C4B1F84.5030306@2ndquadrant.com> <4C4C83DF.3010703@gmail.com> <4C4C8CCC.7080406@gmail.com> <4C4D6396.5020707@gmail.com> <4C4DAAE8.3060501@2ndquadrant.com> <4C4DE50B.1060102@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C4DE50B.1060102@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_05=-0.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/388 X-Sequence-Number: 39777 Yeb Havinga wrote: >> To get similar *average* performance results you'd need to put about >> 4 drives and a BBU into a server. The > Please forget this question, I now see it in the mail i'm replying to. Sorry for the spam! -- Yeb