Message-ID: <4C6D0615.70109@edd.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:23:17 +0200
From: Philippe Rimbault <primbault@edd.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100619 Icedove/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit
 desktop
References: <4C6CE64D.6070104@edd.fr>
	<AANLkTi=tFpkDkcJy0nsdMLTwUwYDfiuNq5+RD_2vcYh_@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=tFpkDkcJy0nsdMLTwUwYDfiuNq5+RD_2vcYh_@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 19/08/2010 11:51, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Philippe Rimbault<primbault@edd.fr>  wrote:
>    
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm having a strange performance result on a new database server compared to
>> my simple desktop.
>>
>> The configuration of the new server :
>>     - OS : GNU/Linux Debian Etch x86_64
>>     - kernel : Linux 2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jun 20 20:40:33 UTC
>> 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>         (tests are on the "real server", not on a vserver)
>>     - CPU : 2 x Six-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2427 @ 2.20GHz
>>     - RAM : 32 Go
>> The configuration of my desktop pc :
>>     - OS : GNU/Linux Debian Testing i686
>>     - kernel : Linux 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010 i686
>> GNU/Linux
>>     - CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E7500  @ 2.93GHz
>>     - RAM : 2 Go
>>      
> PERFORMANCE STUFF DELETED FOR BREVITY
>
>    
>> Do you think it's a 32bit/64bit difference ?
>>      
> No, it's likely that your desktop has much faster CPU cores than your
> server, and it has drives that may or may not be obeying fsync
> commands.  Your server, OTOH, has more cores, so it's likely to do
> better under a real load.  And assuming it has more disks on a better
> controller it will also do better under heavier loads.
>
> So how are the disks setup anyway?
>    
Thanks for your reply !

The server use a HP Smart Array P410 with a Raid 5 array on Sata 133 disk.
My desktop only use one Sata 133 disk.
I was thinking that my simples queries didn't use disk but only memory.
I've launch a new pgbench with much more client and transactions :

Server :
     postgres$ pgbench -c 400 -t 100
     starting vacuum...end.
     transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
     scaling factor: 1
     query mode: simple
     number of clients: 400
     number of transactions per client: 100
     number of transactions actually processed: 40000/40000
     tps = 115.054386 (including connections establishing)
     tps = 115.617186 (excluding connections establishing)

     real    5m47.706s
     user    0m27.054s
     sys     0m59.804s

Desktop :
     postgres$ time pgbench -c 400 -t 100
     starting vacuum...end.
     transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
     scaling factor: 1
     query mode: simple
     number of clients: 400
     number of transactions per client: 100
     number of transactions actually processed: 40000/40000
     tps = 299.456785 (including connections establishing)
     tps = 300.590503 (excluding connections establishing)

     real    2m13.604s
     user    0m5.304s
     sys     0m13.469s