Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AC41337B55 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:32:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73160-07 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:32:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB731336705 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:32:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (static-71-179-240-8.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MZfTi-1POt0O3VrK-00LiQk; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB400E9.401@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:32:09 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mladen Gogala CC: Scott Carey , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org >> \"pgsql-performance@postgresql.org\"" Subject: Re: Slow count(*) again... References: <201010091626.18636.neil.whelchel@gmail.com> <4CB11CC7.8070300@vmsinfo.com> <4CB167CA.9070109@postnewspapers.com.au> <4CB1F46E.80205@vmsinfo.com> <90E30938-1E5E-4DCA-A1FB-AEECEB76A70D@richrelevance.com> <4CB3C6B2.8050501@vmsinfo.com> In-Reply-To: <4CB3C6B2.8050501@vmsinfo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:g8smxv92GNgSN5MCXQBlhjnw3C5rUt4ejhHGT64EyRa KCLrL5lStRLLMpneYSnBKPBuVtBL0/xlSkQh3tkSY6v4ySBIDE BLFlbO+STE00gM3/Qn3OrJgWFc4U7gk6Xq7eTSprGXM12aFVNy bM6sR0M+cFxlr/kmZccw/r16C/40O5IhZUCDrTyFXjzT7dja5X 19hcKeAFUc069vnK9mxNArREq74tcCp2KBOUvdkk/k= X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/132 X-Sequence-Number: 40551 Mladen Gogala wrote: > I agree, but I am afraid that after the demise of SGI, XFS isn't being > developed. It's back to being well maintained again; see http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2010/04/the-return-of-xfs-on-linux.html for some history here and why it's become relevant to RedHat in particular recently. -- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance" Pre-ordering at: https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book