Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACE1337B4E for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:55:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63682-04 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from kontorsmtp1.one.com (kontorsmtp1.one.com [195.47.247.16]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3671337B4B for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:55:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.214.53] (unknown [83.221.146.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kontorsmtp1.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52A2F808C7F for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4CC6CFAA.10107@one.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:55:06 +0200 From: Christian Elmerot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: CPUs for new databases Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/431 X-Sequence-Number: 40849 Hello, What is the general view of performance CPU's nowadays when it comes to PostgreSQL performance? Which CPU is the better choice, in regards to RAM access-times, stream speed, cache synchronization etc. Which is the better CPU given the limitation of using AMD64 (x86-64)? We're getting ready to replace our (now) aging db servers with some brand new with higher core count. The old ones are 4-socket dual-core Opteron 8218's with 48GB RAM. Right now the disk-subsystem is not the limiting factor so we're aiming for higher core-count and as well as faster and more RAM. We're also moving into the territory of version 9.0 with streaming replication to be able to offload at least a part of the read-only queries to the slave database. The connection count on the database usually lies in the region of ~2500 connections and the database is small enough that it can be kept entirely in RAM (dump is about 2,5GB). Regards, Christian Elmerot