Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F991337B63
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:55:12 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 95213-01
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:55:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from gw.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627831335B36
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:55:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from Courts-MTA by gw.wicourts.gov
	with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:54:57 -0600
Message-Id: <4CF52C5F0200002500037FBA@gw.wicourts.gov>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:54:55 -0600
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "T.H." <calinet6@gmail.com>,<pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Question about subselect/IN performance
References: <id3d3s$c8s$1@news.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <id3d3s$c8s$1@news.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.21 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201011/417
X-Sequence-Number: 41441

"T.H." <calinet6@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> Also, are there any better ways you can think of doing such an IN
> query, using non-subselect means that might be more efficient?
 
Have you tried the EXISTS predicate?
 
-Kevin