pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem.
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem.
@ 2010-12-02 21:04 Piotr Czekalski <pczekalski@techbaza.pl>
  2010-12-03 07:21 ` Re: Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem. Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Piotr Czekalski @ 2010-12-02 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-performance

Hello Postgres Users.

Last days I've installed and configured new x64 release of PostgreSQL 
running Windows 2008 R2 with dual XEON 5530 processors (2x4xHT = 16 
working units). Previously the database was running on Fedora 12 x86_64 
under Microsoft hypervisor (HyperV) thus because of the network card 
driver limitation there was only one core available.

The problem I'm facing is a very long, single transaction lasting about 
12hours or even more (as it doesn't exist Pragma Autonomous Transaction 
like Oracle has) that consist of tones of PLPGSQL code, processing a lot 
of data, causing huge CPU load and disk drive transfers.
When moved to the x64 system as described above, the shared memory size 
is not a problem anymore, the disk channel is running very smoothly, the 
only suprising think is that the transaction above utilizes only one 
core of the machine - is it possible to parallelize it without rewriting 
all the code from scratch?

Is there any configuration parameter limiting number of CPUs? The 
release is a standard/public x64 binary of PostgreSQL 9.0.1, taken 
following official site.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Piotr Czekalski

-- 

--------------------------------------------------------------
"TECHBAZA.PL" Sp. z o.o.
Technologie WEB, eDB&  eCommerce
OddziaƂ Gliwice
ul. Chorzowska 50
44-100 Gliwice
tel. (+4832) 7186081
fax. (+4832) 7003289





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem.
  2010-12-02 21:04 Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem. Piotr Czekalski <pczekalski@techbaza.pl>
@ 2010-12-03 07:21 ` Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Scott Marlowe @ 2010-12-03 07:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Piotr Czekalski <pczekalski@techbaza.pl>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Piotr Czekalski <pczekalski@techbaza.pl> wrote:
> Hello Postgres Users.
>
> Last days I've installed and configured new x64 release of PostgreSQL
> running Windows 2008 R2 with dual XEON 5530 processors (2x4xHT = 16 working
> units). Previously the database was running on Fedora 12 x86_64 under
> Microsoft hypervisor (HyperV) thus because of the network card driver
> limitation there was only one core available.
>
> The problem I'm facing is a very long, single transaction lasting about
> 12hours or even more (as it doesn't exist Pragma Autonomous Transaction like
> Oracle has) that consist of tones of PLPGSQL code, processing a lot of data,
> causing huge CPU load and disk drive transfers.
> When moved to the x64 system as described above, the shared memory size is
> not a problem anymore, the disk channel is running very smoothly, the only
> suprising think is that the transaction above utilizes only one core of the
> machine - is it possible to parallelize it without rewriting all the code
> from scratch?

A single connection uses a single CPU.  While there's been some talk
of parallelizing some part of pgsql, nothing I know of has been done.

Is it possible you're doing parts in plpgsql that should really be
done externally / with a batch processing system or hadoop or
something?



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-03 07:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-02 21:04 Multicore Postgres 9.0.1 issue - single transaction problem. Piotr Czekalski <pczekalski@techbaza.pl>
2010-12-03 07:21 ` Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox