Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7901337999 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:45:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82026-05 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from adonis.tweakers.net (adonis.tweakers.net [213.239.154.11]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB8F133616B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:45:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from groupware.tweakers.net (groupware.tweakers.net [212.41.134.181]) by adonis.tweakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8AC420C15 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:45:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.75.99.57] by groupware.tweakers.net (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.5) with ESMTP id md50000317993.msg for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:44:36 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: groupware.tweakers.net, Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:44:36 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled) X-Return-Path: acmmailing@tweakers.net X-Envelope-From: acmmailing@tweakers.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <4D8353C3.6060300@tweakers.net> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:44:51 +0100 From: Arjen van der Meijden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Request for feedback on hardware for a new database server References: <871v25jlnb.fsf@googlemail.com> <4D8306E8.6020701@tweakers.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/213 X-Sequence-Number: 42892 On 18-3-2011 10:11, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Arjen van der Meijden > wrote: >> On 18-3-2011 4:02 Scott Marlowe wrote: >> We have several 1U boxes (mostly Dell and Sun) running and had several in >> the past. And we've never had any heating problems with them. That includes >> machines with more power hungry processors than are currently available, all >> power slurping FB-dimm slots occupied and two raid cards installed. > > Note I am talking specifically about the ability to cool the RAID > card, not the CPUS etc. Many 1U boxes have poor air flow across the > expansion slots for PCI / etc cards, while doing a great job cooling > the CPUs and memory. If you don't use high performance RAID cards > (LSI 9xxx Areca 16xx 18xx) then it's not an issue. Open up your 1U > and look at the air flow for the expansion slots, it's often just not > very much. > I was referring to amongst others two machines that have both a Dell Perc 5/i for internal disks and a Perc 5/e for an external disk enclosure. Those also had processors that produce quite some heat (2x X5160 and 2x X5355) combined with all fb-dimm (8x 2GB) slots filled, which also produce a lot of heat. Those Dell Perc's are similar to the LSI's from the same period in time. So the produced heat form the other components was already pretty high. Still, I've seen no problems with heat for any component, including all four raid controllers. But I agree, there are some 1U servers that skimp on fans and thus air flow in the system. We've not had that problem with any of our systems. But both Sun and Dell seem to add quite a bit of fans in the middle of the system, where others may do it a bit less heavy duty and less over-dimensioned. Best regards, Arjen