Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A2E1337B96 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:21:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76947-03 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:21:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366591337B47 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:21:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (mail.highperformancepostgresql.com [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MYaIg-1QQlkh2kFe-00VZU7; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:21:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:21:10 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Intel SSDs that may not suck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:8BwDEgQrCwnf2/+tR/iOvdSdMy3NxX8G1YlaNQuF8eB +tswd64SK3ZOX0rSMh7DqaS/IExDIRxNp6geC/LbYak4SrUHEz q43sggBIwbpSSl8CE/RTEZp5Dk9SWAySMvzFN5M5ZFSX2kB5Oq ttIb0WRXGR08n0MFJ3rPIWrhn9n0nnL7nMfmETCK2CqMweN6VE kY4r2cIgt1y+6tdQXZp62OoipnXpuH5XDL3e0wTKuA= X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/343 X-Sequence-Number: 43022 Today is the launch of Intel's 3rd generation SSD line, the 320 series. And they've finally produced a cheap consumer product that may be useful for databases, too! They've put 6 small capacitors onto the board and added logic to flush the write cache if the power drops. The cache on these was never very big, so they were able to avoid needing one of the big super-capacitors instead. Having 6 little ones is probably a net reliability win over the single point of failure, too. Performance is only a little better than earlier generation designs, which means they're still behind the OCZ Vertex controllers that have been recommended on this list. I haven't really been hearing good things about long-term reliability of OCZ's designs anyway, so glad to have an alternative. *Important*: don't buy SSD for important data without also having a good redundancy/backup plan. As relatively new technology they do still have a pretty high failure rate. Make sure you budget for two drives and make multiple copies of your data. Anyway, the new Intel drivers fast enough for most things, though, and are going to be very inexpensive. See http://www.storagereview.com/intel_ssd_320_review_300gb for some simulated database tests. There's more about the internals at http://www.anandtech.com/show/4244/intel-ssd-320-review and the white paper about the capacitors is at http://newsroom.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/38-4324/Intel_SSD_320_Series_Enhance_Power_Loss_Technology_Brief.pdf Some may still find these two cheap for enterprise use, given the use of MLC limits how much activity these drives can handle. But it's great to have a new option for lower budget system that can tolerate some risk there. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books