Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED14F1337D2A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:13:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40075-02-8 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:13:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from shrek.krogh.cc (2605ds1-ynoe.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.12.24]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB221337FE3 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:47:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shrek.krogh.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538BC32436B; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:47:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at shrek.krogh.cc Received: from shrek.krogh.cc ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shrek.krogh.cc [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KW07Bt8LQDg2; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [90.184.13.151] (2605ds1-ynoe.2.fullrate.dk [90.184.13.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jesper@krogh.cc) by shrek.krogh.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46E45321396; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:47:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4D923749.7080503@krogh.cc> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:47:21 +0200 From: Jesper Krogh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> <535760.62572.qm@web111307.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <8BE8F356-319F-4BE7-BE66-F45D50235985@torgo.978.org> <4D9204E9.1060403@krogh.cc> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/362 X-Sequence-Number: 43041 On 2011-03-29 18:50, Jeff wrote: > > we have some new drives that we are going to use initially, but > eventually it'll be a secure-erase'd one we replace it with (which > should perform identical to a new one) > > What enclosure & controller are you using on the 24 disk beast? > LSI 8888ELP and a HP D2700 enclosure. Works flawlessly, the only bad thing (which actually is pretty grave) is that the controller mis-numbers the slots in the enclosure, so you'll have to have the "mapping" drawn on paper next to the enclosure to replace the correct disk. -- Jesper