Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DBF1337B4E for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:26:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89287-06 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 01:26:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F111337A5D for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:26:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (mail.highperformancepostgresql.com [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LsOqW-1Pvwe00d5M-011vUG; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:26:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4D9A6FB6.2000702@2ndQuadrant.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:26:14 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> In-Reply-To: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:flgObH8YAdBZ1rDYwPsrEpBhAW9N9T+Qz/WqYCNNF2s j4623Qi3yAB5vMayMghWQyRhiOAUpiz8GIUjd1q4vbh/JJeXJq HfvE49vfTBvHkUEe3nyS6pZqvPRUNWfI2mnIS/NK8pr4BY5P5x QEsljvdxC3NfKvqv6TJhUlk/4JFmg0V24ZJGMAdIpP6Maenfyv Fu2Y6C/WU7D+KRSP/GdH9Foven0Nu3dez4ltzU/IGY= X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/24 X-Sequence-Number: 43086 On 03/28/2011 04:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Today is the launch of Intel's 3rd generation SSD line, the 320 > series. And they've finally produced a cheap consumer product that > may be useful for databases, too! They've put 6 small capacitors onto > the board and added logic to flush the write cache if the power drops. I decided a while ago that I wasn't going to buy a personal SSD until I could get one without a volatile write cache for less than what a battery-backed caching controller costs. That seemed the really disruptive technology point for the sort of database use I worry about. According to http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167050 that point was today, with the new 120GB drives now selling for $240. UPS willing, later this week I should have one of those here for testing. A pair of those mirrored with software RAID-1 runs $480 for 120GB. LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i with 512MB cache is $330, ditto 3ware 9750-4i. Battery backup runs $135 to $180 depending on model; let's call it $150. Decent "enterprise" hard drive without RAID-incompatible firmware, $90 for 500GB, need two of them. That's $660 total for 500GB of storage. If you really don't need more than 120GB of storage, but do care about random I/O speed, this is a pretty easy decision now--presuming the drive holds up to claims. As the claims are reasonable relative to the engineering that went into the drive now, that may actually be the case. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books