Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A7B1337A5D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 01:28:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61960-04 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 04:28:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from shrek.krogh.cc (2605ds1-ynoe.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.12.24]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F8A133655C for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 01:28:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shrek.krogh.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF7B2CD029; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:28:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at shrek.krogh.cc Received: from shrek.krogh.cc ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shrek.krogh.cc [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7UPp8n2UlHGZ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [90.184.13.151] (2605ds1-ynoe.2.fullrate.dk [90.184.13.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jesper@krogh.cc) by shrek.krogh.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51F7D2CD022; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:27:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4D9D3D4D.300@krogh.cc> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:27:57 +0200 From: Jesper Krogh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Smith , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> In-Reply-To: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/68 X-Sequence-Number: 43130 On 2011-03-28 22:21, Greg Smith wrote: > Some may still find these two cheap for enterprise use, given the use > of MLC limits how much activity these drives can handle. But it's > great to have a new option for lower budget system that can tolerate > some risk there. > Drifting of the topic slightly.. Has anyone opinions/experience with: http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-z-drive-r2-p88-pci-express-ssd.html They seem to be "like" the FusionIO drives just quite a lot cheaper, wonder what the state of those 512MB is in case of a power-loss. -- Jesper