pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed[OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)
@ 2011-05-20 16:47 Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
2011-05-23 13:26 ` Re: [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?) Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lew @ 2011-05-20 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-performance
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Strange, John W" wrote:
>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
>> information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is
>> STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
>
> You probably already know this, but just to make sure -- you posted
> this to a public list which is automatically replicated to several
> websites freely available to everyone on the planet.
It's irrelevant, since that "STRICTLY PROHIBITED" verbiage is irrelevant,
unenforceable and legally meaningless. I could post that message on my
personal blog, being not the intended recipient myself, and they would b e
utterly powerless to do anything about it even if they sent it privately to my
personal email inbox.
I don't even know why people bother even putting such nonsense into their
emails, let alone Usenet or mailing-list posts.
--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)
2011-05-20 16:47 [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
@ 2011-05-23 13:26 ` Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shaun Thomas @ 2011-05-23 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>; +Cc: pgsql-performance
On 05/20/2011 11:47 AM, Lew wrote:
> I don't even know why people bother even putting such nonsense into
> their emails, let alone Usenet or mailing-list posts.
This may sound like a surprise, but many of us don't. Several companies
use an auto-append on any outgoing message not sent to an internal
recipient. You can see this for yourselves in this message, as my
company's little blurb gets attached after my signature lines. It's just
standard boilerplate meant as a CYA measure, really.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@peak6.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-23 13:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-20 16:47 [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
2011-05-23 13:26 ` Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox