Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E97B5DC12 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 07:15:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41008-02 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 10:15:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [202.78.240.40]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AF0B5DC10 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 07:15:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFD3323E2; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:15:17 +1200 (NZST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at catalyst.net.nz Received: from mail.catalyst.net.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bertrand.catalyst.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcfhvGGGmHRD; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:15:16 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (122-60-64-230.jetstream.xtra.co.nz [122.60.64.230]) (Authenticated sender: mark.kirkwood) by mail.catalyst.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54402322A7; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:15:16 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <4DE0CB33.5060703@catalyst.net.nz> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:15:15 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?R3J6ZWdvcnogSmHFm2tpZXdpY3o=?= CC: Kevin Grittner , Greg Smith , postgres performance list Subject: Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS References: <4DDD81BB.4080801@catalyst.net.nz> <4DDD85C7.6030109@catalyst.net.nz> <4DDE0E77.6070804@catalyst.net.nz> <4DDEDFFF.1060304@2ndquadrant.com> <4DDEE0CF.5040800@catalyst.net.nz> <4DDEE580.3040305@catalyst.net.nz> <4DDF7110020000250003DDD4@gw.wicourts.gov> <4DE032BB.1070401@catalyst.net.nz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/411 X-Sequence-Number: 43920 On 28/05/11 21:42, Grzegorz Jaƛkiewicz wrote: > Yeah, I got it Mark. > > Unfortunately my current management decided to suspend that > investigation for a while, so I can't get any tests done or anything > like that. > > However we found out that another server we have shows similar issues. > The same card, slightly different motherboard and completely different > disks. > The basic issue is around concurrent reads and writes. The card is > ok-ish when one process hammers the disks, but as soon as it is > multiple ones - it just blows (and I use it as a technical term ;) ). > Still, with only one process reading/writing - the raid card sucks big > time performance wise. > Sorry, Grzegorz I didn't mean to suggest you were not listening, I meant to ask if you could run the megaraid cli command to see if it showed up a battery! If/when your management decide to let you look at this again, I'll be happy to help if I can! Best wishes Mark